Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2002-022
Original file (2002-022.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 
 
Application for Correction of  
Coast Guard Record of: 
 
 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 
    

 
 
 
BCMR Docket  
No.   2002-022 
 

  FINAL DECISION 

The  final  decision,  dated  August  15,  2002,  is  signed  by  the  three  duly 

 
ULMER, Chair: 
 
 
This  is  a  proceeding  under  the  provisions  of  section  1552  of  Title  10  and 
section 425 of Title 14 of the United States Code.  It was commenced on January 14, 
2002, upon the Board’s receipt of the applicant’s complete application for correction 
of his military record.   
 
 
appointed members who were designated to serve as the Board in this case. 
 
 
The applicant asked the Board to correct his record by changing his home of 
record  from  XXXXXXXXX,  New  Jersey  to  XXXXXXXXXX,  Kansas.    He  is  currently 
assigned to duty in the state of XXXXXXX.   
 
 
On August 22, 2000, the applicant enlisted in the Coast Guard for two years.  
He had previously served in the Army, from which he was discharged on August 20, 
2000.    
 
 
The applicant stated that “[w]hen [he] entered the [Coast Guard] [he] was on 
[terminal]  leave  from  the  US  Army  and  went  to  visit  [his]  parents.    Rather  than 
traveling back to XXXXXXXXX, MO MEPS [Military Enlistment Processing Station] 
[he] enlisted at XXXXXXXXX, NY MEPS.  At that time [he and his family] were living 
with his father in New Jersey and listed that as [his] address on all [his] paperwork 
upon entry [into] the [Coast Guard].”   
 
 
The  applicant  further  stated  that  after  becoming  an  adult  he  lived  in 
XXXXXXXXX, Kansas for nearly five years and his wife has lived there her entire life.  
He needs this correction to his record, so that his household goods can be shipped to 
XXXXXXXXXX,  which  is  were  he  plans  to  live  after  his  discharge  from  the  Coast 
Guard.   
 
Views of the Coast Guard 
 

 
On  May  22,  2002,  the  Board  received  an  advisory  opinion  from  the  Chief 
Counsel  of  the  Coast  Guard.    He  recommended  that  the  Board  deny  relief  to  the 
applicant because the applicant failed to submit persuasive evidence that his home of 
record was incorrectly listed in his military record.   
 
 
The Chief Counsel stated that the applicant listed XXXXXXXX, New Jersey as 
his home of record when he enlisted in the Army in 1995 and listed XXXXXXXXX, 
New  Jersey  as  his  home  record  when  he  entered  the  Coast  Guard  in  2000.    He 
asserted that a change in the applicant’s home of record will “presumably save the 
applicant money in moving expenses once he separates from the Coast Guard.”   
 
The  Chief  Counsel  stated  that  the  Joint  Federal  Travel  Regulations  (JFTR) 
 
define  home  of  record  as    "the  place  recorded  as  the  home  of  the  individual  when 
reinstated,  reappointed,  or  reenlisted  remains  the  same  as  that  recorded  when 
commissioned,  appointed,  enlisted  or  inducted  or  ordered  into  the  tour  of  duty 
unless  there  is  a  break  in  service  of  more  than  one  day."    The  Chief  Counsel  also 
stated that a note in the JFTR states the following: 
 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 

 
 
The  Board  makes  the  following findings and conclusions on the basis of the 
applicant's  record  and  submissions,  the  Coast  Guard's  submission,  and  applicable 
law: 
 
 
10, United States Code.  The application was timely. 
 
 
2.  The applicant has failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that 
his  home  of  record  was  incorrectly  recorded  in  his  military  record  at  the  time  he 

1.  The Board has jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to section 1552(b) of title 

Travel  and  transportation  allowances  are  based  on  the  officially 
corrected recording in those instances when through a bona fide error, 
the  place  originally  named  at  time  of  current  entry  into  the  service 
wasn’t  in  fact  the  actual  home.    Any  such  correction  must  be  fully 
justified  and  the  home,  as  corrected,  must  be  the  actual  home  of  the 
member upon entering the service, and not a different place selected for 
the member’s convenience.   

 
 
The Chief Counsel argued that any change to the applicant's home of record 
should result from a bona fide error at the time of his enlistment in the Coast Guard 
and not a correction based on a matter of convenience.   
 
Applicant's Rebuttal to the Views of the Coast Guard 
. 
 
for his reply.  He did not submit a response. 
 

On May 24, 2002, a copy of the Coast Guard views was mailed to the applicant 

entered the Coast Guard.  In this regard, the Board notes that according to the Coast 
Guard,  the  applicant  listed  New  Jersey  as  his  home  of  record  when  he  joined  the 
Army  in  1995.    Likewise  when  he  entered  the  Coast  Guard  in  2000  he  listed  New 
Jersey, not Kansas, as his home of record. In addition according to his statement, his 
parents live in New Jersey.  All of these factors strongly suggest that at the time the 
applicant entered the Coast Guard, XXXXXXXX, New Jersey was properly listed as 
his home of record.  
 
 
lived in Kansas for five years prior to joining the Coast Guard.  
 
 
Jersey was not his home of record at the time he entered the service. 
 
 
 

4. The applicant has not presented persuasive evidence that XXXXXXXX, New 

3.  The applicant provided no evidence except for his own statement that he 

5.  Accordingly, the applicant’s request should be denied. 

 

ORDER 

The  application  of  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX,  USCG,  for  correction  of  his 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

        

 
 
Christopher A. Cook  

 

 

 
Karen L. Petronis  

 

 

 
Kathryn Sinniger  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
military record is denied. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 1999-047

    Original file (1999-047.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On September 1, 1999, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommend- ed that the Board deny the applicant’s request. Under the JFTR, the Home of Record is defined as “the place recorded as the home of the individual when commis- sioned, appointed, enlisted, inducted, or ordered into the relevant tour of active duty.” The Chief Counsel explained that the purpose of having a Home of Record is “to determine the extent of the member’s entitlement to travel...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2003-077

    Original file (2003-077.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx BCMR Docket No. Since he was living in Minnesota when he enlist- ed, under the JFTR, his home of record should have been listed as xxxxxx, MN. ORDER The application of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, USCG, for correction of his military record is granted.

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2008-142

    Original file (2008-142.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He stated that this was an error because Wrightwood, CA, is not his HOR, “but rather where [he] was living while stationed in the Air National Guard. CGPC stated that “[a]t the time of his original enlistment in the Coast Guard, he listed his residence as Wrightwood, CA 92397, and he was enlisted at Recruiting Office San Diego, CA.” CGPC stated that his “HOR for the Coast Guard is based upon his home at the time he enlisted in the Coast Guard.” When he enlisted in the Coast Guard, “he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005846

    Original file (20120005846.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he was living in Alabama at the time of his enlistment in the Army. By law and regulation, the HOR is the place recorded as the home of the individual at the time of their enlistment or induction, and there is no authority to change the HOR officially recorded at the time of entry into military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011119

    Original file (20120011119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his home of record (HOR) as "Texas" instead of "Paterson, New Jersey." The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not show his HOR had been changed before reenlistment. By law and regulation, the HOR is the place recorded as the home of the individual at the time of enlistment or induction, appointment, or entry on active duty, and there is no authority to change the HOR...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2010-165

    Original file (2010-165.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx BCMR Docket No. The PSC stated that the applicant reported his HOR as being in Elmhurst, NY, upon his enlistment and that under COMDTINST M1900.4D, a DD 214 is supposed to show, as the HOR, the “address if known where member originally entered active duty without a break in service.” Because the applicant’s DD 214...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2003-121

    Original file (2003-121.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He stated that every document in the applicant’s record except one shows that Agat, Guam is his home of record. He stated that the applicant and his recruiter, in transferring information from the applicant's enlistment application to his enlistment contract, made a bona fide error in listing the Honolulu, HI address as the applicant's home of record instead of the Agat, Guam address. However, the DD form 1966 (enlistment application) he completed with his recruiter shows the Agat, Guam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020729

    Original file (20130020729.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his home of residence, i.e., Home of Record (HOR)), in item 7b (HOR at Time of Entry) from Spokane, WA, to Boerne, TX. His DD Form 1966/1 (Record of Military Processing) shows in item 4 (HOR Address) the entry "31XX S. Fixxx, Spokane, WA, 99223." In this case, the evidence of record shows upon his enlistment in the DEP and subsequent enlistment in the RA in May 2008, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002906

    Original file (20090002906.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no authority to change the HOR as officially recorded at time of entry into the military service. However, there is no evidence of record or independent evidence provided by the applicant to indicate his HOR was in error at the time of entry into the Army in 1985, or at the time of his 1989 enlistment or 1993 reenlistment.

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2000-030

    Original file (2000-030.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Chief Counsel also argued that the applicant has not presented evi- dence that “overcome[s] the presumption that Coast Guard officials carried out their duties correctly, lawfully, and in good faith,” nor shown that the Coast Guard committed any “error or injustice entitling him to the requested relief.” He stated that any determination by the Board that the Coast Guard was required to accept one of the applicant’s offers (inter-service transfer) over the other (direct commission through...